![]()
|
|||
| |
|||
Applications of monoclonal anti-human inhibin f subunit in endometrial curettings Leonardo
D. Santos A1, James L. C. Yong A1, Xiao Juan Wu A1 Aims: Using archival material,
authors studied the immunoreactivity and utility of monoclonal anti-human
inhibin f subunit in the identification of chorionic villi (CV) and
trophoblastic subpopulations in endometrial curettings (EC) from patients who
had intra-uterine, ectopic, molar and, particularly, probable intra-uterine
pregnancies. Authors also compared its expression with those of gHCG, HPL and
CAM 5.2. Methods: The four groups of EC
investigated included: Group 1, 15 patients with intra-uterine pregnancies
(IUP); Group 2, 15 patients with tubal pregnancies (TP); Group 3, 15 patients
with hydatidiform moles (HM); and Group 4, 20 patients with purported history
of intra-uterine pregnancies (PIUP). Positive and negative control cases were
from Groups 1 and 3 and Group 2, respectively. The test cases were from Group
4. Immunohistochemistry was performed on each case testing for expression of
inhibin f, gHCG, HPL and CAM 5.2. Results: Trophoblastic populations,
which included syncytiotrophoblast (ST), cytotrophoblast (CT) and intermediate
trophoblast (IT), were absent in all 15 negative control cases (Group 2). The
30 positive control cases (Groups 1 and 3) revealed the following: (a) ST, CT
and IT were identified in all cases and were positive for CAM 5.2, (b) inhibin
f, gHCG and HPL (except one case) were reactive for all cases with ST, but not
CT, and (c) IT positivity for gHCG, HPL and inhibin f was 67, 80-93 and 100%,
respectively. From the 20 test cases (Group 4), the findings were: (a) CT was
absent in all cases, (b) scattered ST cells, which were identified only in 10
cases, were positive for all antibodies, (c) scattered IT cells were present in
17 cases and showed 100% CAM 5.2 positivity, and (d) IT positivity for gHCG,
inhibin f and HPL was 58.8% (10/17), 76.5% (13/17) and 82.4% (14/17),
respectively. Background staining was observed in 22 of 65 cases (33.8%)
stained with gHCG and HPL; half of these cases came from Group 3. Inhibin f and
CAM 5.2 staining did not show this problem. Conclusions:
Authors suggest that inhibin f is a useful antibody in diagnosing IUP
and HM and in documenting intra-uterine gestations in cases with PIUP because
it is a sensitive marker in immunolabelling IT and ST. Combined application of
inhibin f and CAM 5.2 might be more useful than gHCG and HPL because the latter
showed background staining in one third of the cases. Pathology 35(3): 217-223, 2003
Apoptosis, Proliferation, and Expression of p53 and bcl-2 in
Endocervical Glandular Intraepithelial Lesions and Invasive Endocervical
Adenocarcinoma.
Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2004 Jan; 23(1): 1-6.
SARS
case in lab worker The
World Health Organization has confirmed that it has
received a report from Taipei that a 44-year-old male lab worker, working in a
military laboratory has been infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome
(SARS). The news has raised fears once again that another outbreak of the
disease could originate from a lab. Tests
conducted in two Taiwan laboratories confirmed the presence of SARS coronavirus
in the lab worker. The lab is the only level P4 lab in Taiwan. At the moment,
this appears to be an isolated incident, but all contacts are being followed.
This incident illustrates that SARS presents a continuing threat. In the
post-epidemic period, the greatest risk from SARS may be through exposure in
laboratories where the virus is used or stored, WHO said in a statement. For
this reason, WHO urges countries to conduct an inventory of laboratories and
samples that they hold and to ensure that the correct biosafety procedures are
being followed, as approved at a WHO laboratory workshop on 22 October,
2003. The Scientist, Dec. 17, 2003
Results from
laboratory tests have confirmed a case of SARS in a 32-year-old man in the southern
Chinese province of Guangdong. The patient is a television producer who has
been under treatment, in isolation, at a hospital in the provincial capital,
Guangzhou, since December 20. This is the first confirmed case of SARS in 2004,
and the first case not linked to a laboratory accident that has occurred since
the initial outbreak of SARS was declared contained on July 5, 2003. World Health Organisation, Jan. 6, 2004
Interpretation
of diagnostic laboratory tests for severe acute respiratory syndrome: the
Toronto experience Patrick Tang, Marie Louie, Susan E. Richardson, et
al. Background:
An outbreak of
severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) began in Canada in February 2003. The
initial diagnosis of SARS was based on clinical and epidemiological criteria.
During the outbreak, molecular and serologic tests for the SARS associated
coronavirus (SARS-CoV) became available. However, without a gold standard, it
was impossible to determine the usefulness of these tests. Authors describe how
these tests were used during the first phase of the SARS outbreak in Toronto
and offer some recommendations that may be useful if SARS returns. Methods:
Authors examined
the results of all diagnostic laboratory tests used in 117 patients admitted to
hospitals in Toronto who met the Health Canada criteria for suspect or probable
SARS. Focusing on tests for SARS-CoV, we attempted to determine the optimal
specimen types and timing of specimen collection. Results:
Diagnostic test
results for SARS-CoV were available for 110 of the 117 patients. SARS-CoV was
detected by means of reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR)
in at least one specimen in 59 (54.1%) of 109 patients. Serologic test results
of convalescent samples were positive in 50 (96.2%) of 52 patients for whom
paired serum samples were collected during the acute and convalescent phases of
the illness. Of the 110 patients, 78 (70.9%) had specimens that tested positive
by means of RT-PCR, serologic testing or both methods. The proportion of RT-PCR
test results that were positive was similar between patients who met the
criteria for suspect SARS (50.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 38.4%63.2%) and
those who met the criteria for probable SARS (58.0%, 95% CI 44.2% 70.7%).
SARS-CoV was detected in nasopharyngeal swabs in 33 (32.4%) of 102 patients, in
stool specimens in 19 (63.3%) of 30 patients, and in specimens from the lower
respiratory tract in 10 (58.8%) of 17 patients. Interpretation:
These findings
suggest that the rapid diagnostic tests in use at the time of the initial
outbreak lack sufficient sensitivity
to be used clinically to rule out SARS. As tests for SARS-CoV continue to be
optimized, evaluation of the clinical presentation and elucidation of a contact
history must remain the cornerstone of SARS diagnosis. In patients with SARS,
specimens taken from the lower respiratory tract and stool samples test
positive by means of RT-PCR more often than do samples taken from other areas. CMAJ 2004; 170(1): 47-54
Bacterial antigen detection test in meningitis Das
BK, Gurubacharya RL, Mohapatra TM, Mishra OP Department of Pediatrics, Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, India. Objective: To evaluate the role of
bacterial antigen detection test in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) for a rapid
etiological diagnosis of bacterial meningitis. Methods: The study included 36 cases of
bacterial meningitis and 14 controls. Latex particle agglutination test (LPA
test) for detection of bacterial antigen was done in the CSF using slidex
meningitis kit (Biomeriux, France). Results: Using LPA test, an etiological
diagnosis could be made in 83% cases of bacterial meningitis. In contrast, CSF
Gram stain and culture showed 36% and 6% positivity, respectively. The
sensitivity and specificity of LPA test were 83% and 100%, respectively. The
common etiological organisms were S. pneumoniae, H. influenzae type b and N.
meningitidis A. S. pneumoniae was
encountered in all age groups while H. influenzae type b was found only below
one year of age. Conclusions: LPA test is a rapid and superior
diagnostic tool as compared to CSF Gram stain and culture. The study recommends
LPA test as an adjunct laboratory test for rapid etiological diagnosis of
bacterial meningitis for prompt institution of proper antibiotics. Indian J Pediatr. 2003: 70(10):
799-801.
|
|||
| Back Home | |||